Skip to main content

Alberta First Nations appeal suspension of oilpatch environmental monitoring

#674 of 1611 articles from the Special Report: Coronavirus in Canada
aerial photo, tar sands mine facility, Fort McMurray, Alberta,
This Sept. 19, 2011 aerial photo shows a tar sands mine facility near Fort McMurray, in Alberta. File photo by The Canadian Press/Jeff McIntosh

Three northern Alberta First Nations are asking to appeal the province's suspension of environmental monitoring in the oilpatch because it "fails to come close" to being a reasonable decision.

Alberta's Opposition leader called on Monday for the head of the province's energy regulator to resign over the suspensions.

"They should end (Laurie) Pushor's contract," Rachel Notley said Monday.

"We've gone from having a world-class monitoring agency and we've turned it into a backroom, deal-making agency in the course of just a few months."

The Mikisew Cree First Nation, the Fort McKay First Nation and the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation have filed their request to the regulator's internal review body. The Alberta Energy Regulator made the decision earlier this spring to suspend monitoring in what it said was an attempt to keep workers and communities safe during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Three northern Alberta First Nations are asking to appeal the province's suspension of environmental monitoring in the oilpatch because it "fails to come close" to being a reasonable decision.

Companies no longer have to monitor fumes released by burning, or look for and repair leaks of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Surface water need no longer be tested, unless it escapes into the environment.

Most soil and groundwater monitoring is gone. In-situ oilsands operations no longer have to conduct any wildlife monitoring or research. Reclamation and wetland monitoring is also suspended.

Although some operations must resume Sept. 30, most suspensions have no end date.

"There was no consultation. There was no notification of any kind," said Melody Lepine of the Mikisew Cree. "We were all quite shocked and quite upset."

The appeal argues that the suspensions were made without any rationale linking specific activities to COVID-19 risks and despite work continuing at energy facilities. It points out the hold on monitoring came as Alberta was starting to ease its lockdown and weeks after the province declared a state of emergency over the pandemic.

The appeal alleges the move was made at the urging of industry without any attempt to hear from anyone else involved.

"The long-term consequences of this disregard for the separation between the regulator and the regulated are highly troubling," says the appeal.

"(They are) to allow proponents to effectively trigger AER decisions ... in a way that circumvents the AER’s application process (and) undermines the integrity of the entire statutory regime for energy development in the province."

A comment from the regulator wasn't immediately available.

Notley said Pushor, who took over the agency after its previous head left under a cloud of financial wrongdoing, is too close to the Premier Jason Kenney's United Conservative government to be an independent regulator.

"There's no question that Pushor is an extension of Kenney's UCP agenda. They're one and the same."

She said consulting with First Nations affected by a regulatory decision should be "instinctive" by now.

"They walked through the looking glass into a world that's 25 years old."

Lepine said First Nations still haven't been given any explanation of how the province will track environmental impacts during the suspension.

Monitoring is one of the conditions under which companies are granted access to the land, Lepine noted.

As well, Canada has made international promises to increase monitoring of Wood Buffalo National Park downstream of the oilsands, and the government's decision may break those promises, Lepine said.

She said no information has been forthcoming about the impact of the suspensions on the quality of long-term monitoring.

"Was there an assessment done to evaluate this decision?" Lepine asked.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2020

Comments