Support strong Canadian climate journalism for 2025
A Quebec pulp and paper plant will test the world’s first industrial-scale use of a novel carbon capture technology that could slash emissions from heavy polluting factories, refineries and generating plants.
The near-$24 million project at the Kruger Wayagamack mill in Trois-Rivieres will install a system developed by Mantel Capture that promises to straightaway cut CO2 by 2,000 tonnes a year, a five per cent reduction, by absorbing then “boiling off” the emissions for use as an industrial heat source.
"This project has the potential to offer a sustainable carbon capture, utilization and storage solution for the entire manufacturing sector," said Justin Paillé, senior vice president of manufacturing at Kruger Pulp & Paper, in a statement.
The project, which received nearly $18 million in federal and provincial backing, provided the company with an opportunity to take part in high-level research and development that would benefit the wider sector in its decarbonization efforts, he added.
Kruger expects to capture up to five tonnes of CO2 per day from the Wayagamack mill once the two-year demonstration project starts operating in mid-2025. A company spokesperson told Canada’s National Observer that the technology would “absolutely” be rolled out across its 10 mills in North America if the test phase was successful.
Mantel’s carbon capture technology, based on molten borate salt, has been in development at lab-scale for several years. But the Boston start-up, founded by researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, appears to have cracked the code to commercialize it: an ultra-high-temperature system with very low total energy losses.
How it works
Mantel’s concept, which received a US$30 million investment in September from a Shell-led venture capital group, consists of two phases.
First, flue gas from an industrial facility is channeled into a liquid boron salt-based absorber unit running at 600 C to capture the emissions. The removed CO2 is then transferred to the desorber, where it is boiled off at 800 C to generate heat or steam, for use in industrial processes such as pulping.
The game-changer is the fluid used to absorb CO2 — high temperature liquid borate salt — which is much more efficient than conventional amine-based solvents used in other systems to capture CO2 from flue gas.
“We are absorbing and desorbing at very high temperatures — unlike conventional carbon capture systems which do this at low temperatures — with a lot of energy loss,” said Danielle Rapson, Mantel’s chief operating officer.
"We lose as much energy on desorption but recover it all on absorption, as an exothermic [heat-generating] reaction which can be turned into steam and used on site as useful energy," she told Canada's National Observer.
“This material makes that possible,” Rapson said.
Fuel for the system, which captures over 90 per cent of its own emissions, can range from fossil gas and waste fuels to biomass — and will be convertible to work with hydrogen in the future, said Rapson.
Although the demonstrator project will capture a small volume of CO2, the technology requires vastly less energy – about 0.1 gigajoule per tonne versus 2.5 gigajoule per tonne for other carbon capture methods. This greater efficiency will mean the cost of decarbonizing big industrial facilities becomes economic.
Shift industry thinking
“This will allow industry to completely shift the way it thinks about carbon capture, away from being seen as a parasitic process” in cost-of-energy terms, said Rapson.
Carbon capture has been a technology linked almost exclusively with the oil and gas sector. But the Wayagamack project could awaken industry to the wider potential for decarbonizing heavy-emitting sectors, she said.
"This technology is applicable anywhere there are emissions linked to steam or heat production on site," Rapson said. "Pulp and paper, yes, but the petrochemicals, power generation, and the food and beverage sectors are also ideally suited."
Mantel has said its system could capture carbon for about US$30-50 a tonne at a scale of hundreds of thousands to millions of tonnes, making it economically viable in countries with carbon capture incentives or emissions taxes.
The company sees Canada as an initial $6 billion market for the technology, said Rapson, adding it could expand to be worth $50 billion “if the entire industrial landscape here were to be decarbonized.”
A major commercial-scale project based on Mantel’s molten borates technology could be online within three years in Alberta, she said.
The prairie province is already home to one of the world's largest carbon capture-outfitted biomass plants at forestry giant West Fraser's Hinton pulp mill, where a project with Nova Scotia-based TorchLight Bioresources aims to capture 1-1.3 megatonnes of CO2 a year starting in 2027.
Canada’s pulp and paper industry produces 7.6 million tonnes of the country's total 685 million tonnes of CO2 a year.
Globally, pulp and paper production accounted for two per cent of all emissions from industry, according to 2022 data from the International Energy Agency.
Comments
I am not sure I understand the technology, but my main question is: What do you do with the pure CO2 that is captured?
Can anyone explain?
I have this question as well about the CO2 handling. I found myself somewhat confused as to how effective the technology implementation at this site is expected to be because percent reductions and tonnes removed are both used, but I cannot see a baseline number(s) to which to compare the predicted results. For example, 98% effective removal shows on diagram, then removing 5,000 tonnes per day is stated, etc. To what percentage of overall pre-installation emissions does 5,000 tonnes/day equate?
Not unless it gets buried. Clean CO2 has a commercial market, which would offset the cost of capture, but most of the end uses eventually release the CO2 into the atmosphere, it is quite difficult to bind into a permanent geological time scale sink.
So, in the long run, as described, this is just handwaving and green washing, as a heat exchanger would capture the waste heat much less messily.
Oh, and BTW, what happens to the used adsorbent?
The pulp and paper industry’s energy efficiency has been sliding downward notes the IEA. But the International Energy Agency projects worldwide total paper production will increase to 2030 as demand rises for more paper used in packaging. To meet its 2030 net zero targets the industry’s best bet is to switch away from fossil fuels, says the IEA, using high-temperature heat pumps (some able to provide 100-165ºC), and biofuels. One might ask if pulp and paper processes don’t need temperatures as high as 600-800ºC that carbon capture needs, who benefits from carbon capture in the forest products industry? Fossil fuel sellers win doubly by keeping pulp and paper companies as a regular fuel customer and also needing to up its gas consumption to clean flue gas it wouldn’t have as much of if it used more clean electricity and less gas.