Good morning,

In Canada, it’s easy to forget how damaging coal is to air quality and the climate. Despite our growing exports, almost all of our own coal-fired power plants have been replaced by hydroelectricity, gas and renewables. When there are no fires, our air is generally clear. 

Step outdoors in Ulaanbaatar, the capital of Mongolia, where I happened to visit last month, and your eyes immediately sting and your throat gets so scratchy, you wonder if you are coming down with something and should have masked on the plane. Ulaanbaatar is a modest city of 1.5 million with an air pollution problem so bad there are Reddit threads debating whether it is the world’s worst. 

The primary culprit is coal, which is burned to produce 70 per cent of Mongolia’s power. Coal is plentiful in Mongolia and it is fed into generation plants whose stacks loom large on the skyline. Mountains ringing Ulaanbaatar trap the pollution, covering the city in a grey-brown haze. On the day we arrived, the air was so bad, it brought back memories of visiting Mexico City in the 1980s when the pollution was so thick birds reportedly dropped dead from the sky.

Coal pollution is deleterious to human health; it contributes to increased rates of childhood asthma, heart and lung disease and some cancers. It is also a climate catastrophe. Coal is the most carbon intensive of all fossil fuels and is responsible for about a third of the world’s carbon emissions, causing global heating.

But coal is not Mongolia’s only problem. Ulaanbaatar is a classic case of a city that has come into some money, creating a middle class that can afford to drive while making minimal investment in public transit. The streets are jammed with gas and diesel vehicles. Hour-long gridlock is routine, and on one day where people from across the country were flooding into the capital for a festival, we crept forward only inches at a time for three hours until the van we were in overheated and we were forced to stop for an early dinner. 

There are buses, but not enough of them to get people where they need to go. Apart from that, there is no public transit. There were painted bike lanes in spots and a few very brave cyclists. But to my eye, riding a bike in Ulaanbaatar looked like a fast route to an early death.

Not surprisingly, air pollution is a topic of conversation in Mongolia. One young man I met told me he loves Ulaanbaatar in the summer because the air is actually better. Come winter, people on the outskirts living in gers (yurts) burn coal for heat and inversions conspire further to trap the pollution. My heart broke a bit for all of them as I thought about the fresh Vancouver air I am privileged to breathe.

The glaring juxtaposition between Ulaanbaatar and my own home got me thinking a lot about coal and Canada’s contribution to its worldwide supply. When my colleague Cloe Logan dug into the numbers, she found that Canada produced 47.3 million tonnes of coal, 41 per cent of which was thermal, the type burned in power plants for electricity. 

Some is used here at home in coal-fired power plants in Saskatchewan, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. Alberta, to its credit, powered down its last remaining plant this summer, two years ahead of schedule. 

Although Canada is pushing hard to end the use of coal to generate electricity here at home, we still have a thriving export business in metallurgical coal (the kind used to make steel) and thermal coal to other countries. 

Weaning entire countries off coal is not simple and it would be misguided to blame Mongolia’s coal use for climate change. It’s a tiny nation, contributing only about .07 per cent to the world’s total carbon emissions, and some of the outer reaches of the country still have no electricity at all. (Although large-scale renewable energy is rare, many gers are kitted out with solar panels for charging phones.) Canada’s share of emissions clocks higher at 1.5 per cent, and both pale in comparison to China at 31 per cent and the United States at 13.5 per cent.

But as I coughed and put eye drops in my scratchy eyes on an Ulaanbaatar summer day, it impressed upon me how important it is to end our planet’s remaining dependence on coal. Removing even this single fossil fuel from the equation would improve human health in places where its particulates muddy the air and would go far to reducing a huge chunk of global carbon pollution. 

It will take time to transition away from metallurgical coal in some industries, such as steel manufacturing, where cost-effective alternatives are still scarce. But there are plenty of replacements for coal-generated electricity, starting with wind and solar, which are inexpensive and quick to install. Thermal or possibly nuclear energy can also be an option in places where easier, cleaner alternatives won’t suffice.

So let’s start by ending our dependence on thermal coal. Canada recognizes its responsibility on that front. In 2021, the Liberals promised to work toward banning thermal coal exports by 2030. Yet in 2022, one year after writing that goal into Environment and Climate Change Minister Steven Guilbeault’s mandate letter, our 2022 coal exports hit an eight-year high. Let’s hope the trend reverses when the 2023 numbers come out. Everyone will breathe easier when that day comes.

—Adrienne Tanner

TOP STORY

🪓 Temporary foreign workers are in unexpected places — and for a very specific reason

Canada’s use of workers from overseas caught international attention this week as the UN’s Special Rapporteur slammed the practice here — calling Canada’s temporary foreign worker program “a breeding ground” for modern slavery. It just so happened that Hope Lompe had a scoop ready, showing the practice has exploded in a new sector here: logging. 

Meanwhile, David Moscrop weighed in on why, exactly, the Liberal government has been leaning so heavily on temporary foreign workers. Hint: it’s not for the workers’ sake, or ours. 

Quote of the week

“I bet that if it was going to cost whoever it was — a car manufacturer, someone selling inflatable unicorns like we’ve found on the beaches here — if it was going to cost them more money to recycle it, overnight they would find some better way of doing it, some better product.” — Ryan Masson, captain of the Island Roamer, which took reporter Natasha Bulowski along for a cleanup of B.C.’s remote central coast.

MORE CNO READS

🏭 John O’Connor has been sounding the alarm on the harm from oilsands-related pollution for more than a decade. He was silenced by the Alberta government for his efforts, and has struggled to bring the issue to public attention ever since — so now, with the federal government finally agreeing to study the health effects of oilsands pollution itself, O’Connor says the moment is bittersweet. 

The announcement represents the very first acknowledgment of the issue from any level of government.

Meanwhile, O’Connor has taken on another battle — one that’s closer to home, in his own backyard, but bears much of the same hallmarks of government-aided pollution. 

Matteo Cimellaro reports. 

Big Oil is lobbying aggressively against climate action

John Woodside reports.

🐻Preconstruction work on Canada’s nuclear waste facility was not about to grind to a halt to make way for a families of black bears. When Canadian Nuclear Laboratories came across three dens inhabited by eight black bears they started an eviction process, consisting of plywood barriers and tarps and noise emission devices. That isn’t washing well with the Kebaowek First Nation that has filed a judicial review, citing the company failed to consult and consider the nation’s inherent rights as Indigenous peoples before proceeding with the project.  

Matteo Cimellaro reports.